Continuing the discussion from UK Politics Thread (Part 4):
I haven’t accused you of anything apart from posting unfavourably towards farmers. I never misrepresented you because I didn’t state what you said. Further more all I asked for was you to clarify your position.
It is quite simple really!
You stated that one of your biggest issues was corporate ownership of the food chain. True or False?
Knowing your support on Labours policy to remove the Inheritance Tax relief on Farmers (a policy they rowed back on) all I asked for was you to clarify your stance. True or False?
You have failed to clarify your stance, by side stepping the question. Making some non comparable comparison and falling back to your de facto get out of jail clause of calling me out for responding in bad practice and then throwing the why do I bother, it’s a waste of time rhetoric.
Frustration:
It’s wearing thin mate, I have responded to you numerous times in good faith and never got a true answer in return. It’s gotten to a point where I have to highlight where my responses are to be taken in jest for fear of your over reaction.
It is quite alright for you to throw unjustified negatives at me and yet when I jokingly suggest you would make a good politician I get the “don’t you ever” response.
Funnily enough, your impassioned response actually made me question whether after being labelled a racist amongst other things I was being a bit aggressive/unfair by comparing you to a politician.
You are one of the main voices on this thread, one that I pay attention to. I personally feel that you could use that voice more positively.