The debates are normally along these lines. They are normally run by an independent commission, but for this cycle both parties separately decided to ignore them due to their perceived failures in recent elections. Dems argued they did not do enough to respond to the unique challenges a debate against Trump poses and Trump argued they were biased. With them out of the loop the campaigns have been left to negotiate with the networks directly and winning those rights is seen as a huge coup in an era where corporate news is on its arse.
However, despite the last one being promoted as a CNN debate the feed was sold to other networks and amusingly Fox ended up with higher viewing figures than CNN did for their own debate. Given that there is no reason why they cannot negotiate exactly as you sayā¦go and get a independent studio and have the parties agree on one person from each NBC, Fox, ABC and CBS to participate.
I like the idea that it should be done before early voting starts, even though I donāt think the minds of early voters will be swayed from their decision.
Trump may genuinely think he agreed to debate Biden specifically, but the terms of the agreement with ABC do not specify that. In light of what has now happened it seems likely this language was insisted on by the Biden team to cover this exact situation.
Harris appears to be rejecting Trumpās offer saying she is sticking to the previously agreed schedule and ABC have confirmed they will keep their slot and will air it even if only Kamala shows up. Harris is again refusing to take the bait and instead just turns it around on him.
Maybe it is just me and my imagination, but ever since Biden quit the race, and Kamala Harris has hit the ground sprinting - It dawned on me the other night watching Trump the Ogre, shuffle onto the stage at the Black Journalists Q&A, he seems to be ever so slowly deflating - like one of those balloons that has hung around the party, or wedding reception for far too longā¦
I hope in the next couple of months, his whole demeanour goes down rapidly, and some of his own biased supporters begin to see he has zero dynamism left to even bullshit his way anymoreā¦ What a bitter and twisted way he has chosen to spend the last years of his lifeā¦
As the new Democratic phrase states - WEIRD :0)
i realise The Don is terrible, and far worseā¦this is not about the don, if KH wins and becomes POTUS she needs (or probably doesnt) to behave in a certain manner
the tone of the release is pretty confrontational, , the first line is pretty basic, but that last sentence in her press release is really pathetic, its like a primary school kids taunt, its actually embarrassingā¦
shes on display to the world, she has to deal (we hope) with world leaders
As high minded as it was, and as much as we might wish otherwise, it was a mantra that simply didnt work in electoral politics. The Dems tried to live up to it and get their arses kicked in election after elections all over the country.
There is also a good body of research that the most effective electoral strategy for beating a wannabe strongman candidate in an election is in rolling them over and revealing their soft underbelly. They want to appear threatening and nothing counters that more than mocking them and calling them weak.
maybe there is a ābody of researchā which suggests KH should call her rival āmr anytime anywhereā and taunt him with ā too scared to show upā, but if we are ever to get away from the hatefilled political cycle we currently find ourselves in, then the pollies themselves will eed to do it, they will need to rise above.
the Don is shit. i get it.
pollies are meant to frame society, to infuence it, ultimately, they are meant to work together for the betterment of the people they representā¦they shouldnt keep hiding behind the old ā we need to do this to get inā
thats the thing with techniques in anything in anywalk of lifeā¦they are the accepted way to do things, until they are not.
there is a better wayā¦a way i think people ac tually want to see, despite ātried and testedā methodsā¦KH didnt do it on that press release.
you can do the āmonkey no seeā emoji thing all you like as if im some niave simpletonā¦you might think it was a good, apprpriate response from Harrisā¦i think it was patheticā¦lowering herself to that levelā¦
I understand in principle what you are saying. I just cannot reconcile it though to the comments in question - calling out a classic bully for running away from an already contest and presenting terms he knows she wont accept. And even if you dont like it and feel justified in saying it is a tone beneath what you wish at least one side maintained, to present it as down to their level is a real lack of perspective.
If Harris is going into the gutter with Trump then she is outmatched. She would be far more effective taking the high road.
Harris and her campaign need to guard against this giddy feeling that they are experiencing right now, itās still the honeymoon, lots of work ahead.
I donāt think she is a particularly skillful debater, so maybe taking the right strategy of not accepting Trumps terms, however I donāt think itās to her advantage not to debate Trump.
I like that she is belittling him. All his opponents to date have played by the Queensbury rules. He canāt handle someone laughing at him, who is well capable of owning him if he will ever dare to debate as he previously agreed.
It seems he needs his Fox protectors, which is not a good look for him.
