Firstly why are they doing that, can they not meet him in the office?
Secondary consider the length of any high up in FSG to this bloke…
There was more public knowledge of the Stasi.
Firstly why are they doing that, can they not meet him in the office?
Secondary consider the length of any high up in FSG to this bloke…
There was more public knowledge of the Stasi.
I just feel this wont happen now.
Yeah I don’t actually think he will ever be a Liverpool player.
All he has to do is blame his agent and go crawling back and everything will be forgotten. He’ll be the prodigal son.
Yup I think I said further up, don’t underestimate the hypocrisy of the football fan.
Anyhow happy he didn’t play against us. Personally the owner and his lot coming around to my house I’d call the police.
Check the drains at Isak’s place ![]()
Has he been seen since their ‘cordial’ visit?
I think the ownership meeting with Isak was a last gasp attempt to see if they can convince him to stay. I think if he stood firm, they’d end up selling.
Maybe that’s why they went on the pitch to break the news to Howe… fuck knows why.
I can see it not happening but who knows. I forgot to take anything Chris Hope says with a bag of salt.
He’s not for sale. But staying without a new contract is not viable
Wut? So much spin that they cannot keep it straight for a single tweet
It also contradicts their claim that they never planned to sell him this summer.
It remains to be seen how much of this is just posturing. But what’s obvious to me is that they would have sold Isak by now if they landed another striker.
Wolves will hand striker Jorgen Strand Larsen a new contract after rejecting a £50m bid from Newcastle but could still be tempted to sell the 25-year-old Norway international if they receive an offer in excess of £75m. (Telegraph - subscription required), external
Strand Larsen is keen to move to Newcastle with the Magpies weighing up another bid, but he is not viewed as a direct replacement for Sweden striker Alexander Isak, 25, who is wanted by Liverpool. (The I - subscription required), external
Newcastle officials, including co-owner Jamie Reuben, have spoken to Isak at the striker’s home in an attempt to convince him to stay at the club and return to Eddie Howe’s squad despite Liverpool’s interest. (Daily Mail)
I don’t think this is going to happen. I expect that Sandcastle will get JSL and will offer Isak a much improved contract which he will accept. Because, money.
I think the owners are more concerned about not losing face in this situation. They don’t want their fans to see them as being a small club supposedly being ‘bullied’ by a big club. Because they’re a big club now! Way aye man.
We need to get a forward in ASAP and I think we should get Rodrygo before one of our rivals get him. Imagine signing Rodrygo and parading him before the Arsenal game just to boil their piss.
Caught Offside is claiming that “internal discussions have taken place” over offering Chiesa to Newcastle as part of a swap deal. Yeah, right.
Will somebody please make it stop.
Isn’t that standard for these football rumour/banter websites … they make me pray for a nuclear holocaust in 10 minutes (sorry I’m stealing Bill Hicks material).
How about we sign someone just because it will improve the squad. I couldn’t give a fig what “Europe’s greatest club side” care about anything. In fact I find that is another thing that can get in the bin, parading signings before a match.
well tak is today we will bid but I dont see it.
I think we need to move onto to someone else and sign a CB.
This has dragged on way to long for anything to happen plus Toon arent getting 2 CFs signed in 7 days when they have failed badly for 12 weeks.
Saying this all along, yes we are thin upfront but at the back too.
I don’t understand why the talk of them needing a replacement is even a talking point to sell him. Hes not playing at the moment they aren’t replacing someone who has played first 2 games of the season.
If Isak accepts a new contract it will probably be because Newcastle refused to sell him and it has a release clause in, rather than just because they offer to pay him more.