Advocating for caution in not drawing conclusion based on preliminary unconfirmed reports in the immediate aftermath of an incident like this ALWAYS ages well, even if some of those reports turn out to be accurate. Otherwise you end up with irresponsible statements about an attack perpetrated by US born military veteran like this…
Also a fair few questions regarding this one (clash report is a Turkish propaganda-like channel, but no reason why this particular news would not be accurate, since it’s not something you “lie” about when spinning a yarn). https://x.com/AnalyticaCamil1/status/1874693662006997146
If the attacks are in some way connected to Trump’s return, the terrorists would have a bigger impact by doing it on his actual return in a couple of weeks. Why do it now while Biden is still in power. So I don’t think its helpful to try to forcefully link it to a political power, people who have gone crazy over a cause they think they are getting behind don’t act rationally. These perpetrators must have heard a holy voice telling them that today is a great day to kill some people for the greater good.
At least the New Orleans one, the FBI is investigating it as an act of terrorism, so to be absolutely correct, it’s not yet classified a confirmed act of terrorism. That is to correct myself in my above post too.
“This aged well” in response to a post pointing out that people were speculating that the perpetrator was Muslim, and that there was no solid information otherwise. That suggests discriminatory intent, and is far more awful than your concern about me supposedly not showing concern for 15 dead people.
Oddly enough I didn’t call it racist to begin with, you did. I literally copied your words, and replaced “unearthing” with “defending”. Who’s the one seeing racism?