[quote=“Hope.in.your.heart, post:1375, topic:2675, full:true”]
Obama having a third term wouldn’t have hindered the orange monkey to come to power eventually.
You absolutely have no way of knowing that, nor does anyone else.
Anyway, FDR was elected four times,fairly popular, many consider him one of the greatest presidents. Democracy should mean being able to kick someone out, I don’t see why it can’t also mean keeping someone in, if the voters (rightly or wrongly) prefer so.
The Kashmiris say hi.
You’re probably right. The problems lie elsewhere, not in the length of a presidency. 
Edit: but it needs someone who is immune to the perversion of power and remains committed to general welfare, not to his or her own. They are very rare as we see. FDR is more than seventy years ago.
Any other democratic country.
A leader losing the elections and refusing to give up the seat in India will have been immediately arrested. There’s no ifs and buts about that. Arrest him. Lodge all the cases there are against him and use a heavy hand with his supporters. He’ll be at the whims of the government and the justice system not the sham that is the US Supreme court.
And I use the term democratic pretty loosely. Even allowing for that loose definition , the US electoral system and democratic system is a sham.