The “high line” is the new zonal marking, or only playing 1 striker at home. It’s a preplaned comment and not only had nothing to do with our issues yesterday but was actually too deep creating too much space between our lines for them to play through.
The dotted lines will show you which part of his body it’s drawn from and in any case it beggars belief how people still can’t interpret angles.
Offsides are called vertically from a side on view…that picture needs to be rotated about 15 degrees clockwise and then you’ll find you answer, but people can’t seem to grasp this.
Well it would help no end if the actual picture used to justify the decision was the adjusted one. It’s just crap communication otherwise.
You can’t interpret angles. They are what they are aren’t they?
There is no good way to display a 3d image in 2d without distortion. This is why the semi autonomous offsides uses completely computer generated graphics so that they put Mo’s shoulder in a place in the 2d image that looks far more clearly offside that it looks by just drawing lines on the 2d image.
I don’t think the distortion matters with this. Ideally what you want to see is a linesman’s view although possibly if they were somewhere up in the stands. What you need to see is the purely side on view.
There is rarely a perfectly side on view. If you get one it is pure luck. That is why the VAR cameras are calibrated prior to every game so that the software that identifies the coordinates of the points being plotted understands the impact of the angle to that point they are getting from the camera.
Cut his hair we would be fine
In light of today’s game - did we make them look good or was this their “1 in a 100” game where they do everything but win by 5 or so goals???