Our other ten players would be blocking their keeper’s line of vision.
1 Like
Salah was offside but he did appear to be pushed
How can something be technically right but subjective? 
1 Like
The first half disallowed goal was the joke of a decision, especially as Tierney letting tackles fly in from Burnley all game.
2 Likes
It’s arguably an offside since he is in front of the keeper (way the keeper is leaning is irrelevant). I have bigger problems with the first goal we got chalked off, since that is actually a bit perplexing. Can’t get very irritated by this one I reckon. And it was VAR who told the ref about the possible offside, too many silly conspiracy theories going around.
No words for this sh7t anymore
But had no impact on the result of the play, Trafford is moving to his right hand side, Salah’s position changes nothing about how Trafford defends the situation.
2 Likes
Both decisions could be said to be to keep the game interesting.
Tierney is a useless twat
2 Likes
Because it is up to the ref’s subjective decision wether to give it or not.
Had this been Shitty, you can bet he would decide to allow it. It’s these subjective decisions that we end up mostly on the wrong side.
Is everyone else awaiting the most controversial penalty ever given going to Burnley any minute now?
2 Likes
Tierney laughing with the burnley players. He doesn’t even hide it
1 Like
Simple rule of thumb. If they can rule against us they will.
City got one earlier this season where the attacker literally blocked the goalkeeper off.
1 Like
tough guy
Var is ruining the fucking game, so sick of it. Offsides and nothing else or fuck the fuck off.
Triple change. Get Nunez off forsure
Diaz jones and szobozo
Yes. At 1-1 against Fulham. Ake goal.
1 Like
Need Luis