Quebec about to require a vaccine passport to enter SAQ, the provincial liquor monopoly (beer and wine is available elsewhere).
There will be tears.
2 Likes
Just out of curiosity has the Nuremberg code been accepted into European law ?
1 Like
There are really interesting debates to be had about this.
Like how in essence with the global push to vaccinate everyone that they basically break every single suggestion ?
The Nuremberg Code relates to ‘medical experiments’.
Do you consider the rollout of an approved vaccine(s) in response to a global pandemic an ‘experiment’?
Also, the vaccine rollout doesn’t break every principle of the code. That’s just hyperbolic nonsense.
2 Likes
How did the testing on animals go? What about the stated consent of the patient and their wish to halt at any time they wish? Also can you tell me what’s in the vaccine ? Why would the results not be made public to the contents for 70 years ? And why remove any chance of liability from the pharmaceutical companies if any adverse affects ? Just asking as I would love to see the spin on all this
With the speed of Omicron, I think it is just a matter of time before that push simply stops. In a matter of weeks, there is very little point in administering a vaccine which requires ~ 2 weeks to reach effectiveness, and 3 doses to be greater than 50% effective against Omicron. By the end of February, the vast majority of humanity will have been infected.
3 Likes
Nothing new there
1 Like
According to Full Fact, very well indeed.
2 Likes
Well I watched a video a while back I think it was in Texas where they had an enquiry and one of the people on the committee asked the person how the animal trials went, and asked is it true that all animals died from the trials , to which the answer was yes and that’s why they skipped the testing on animals …so again is it different standards around the world for what is basically the same vaccines?
By the way, the Nuremburg Code was established after the Second World War in response to the Nazi Government using citizen in non-consensual medical experimentation, including forced sterilisation.
In my opinion anyone invoking it in response to the Covid Vaccine programme should be fucking ashamed of themselves. There is light at the top of the rabbithole. Go to it. Save yourself.
4 Likes
From the Full Fact article you didn’t read.
“Untrue claims that animal testing was not carried out, or that all the animals were killed by vaccines during the trials, have proliferated throughout the vaccine rollout, and we have fact checked them several times before.”
I saw a video? Really?
1 Like
So anyone invoking the Nuremberg code as to what we witnessed happening in previous times uses it to be cautious as to what is happening you say they can go shove it ? Really
Fuck knows. Fuck knows what’s in KFC either but that doesn’t stop a gazillion people stuffing their face either. This whole what’s in the vaccine argument is balls.
3 Likes
That he ‘thinks’ was in Texas.
1 Like
-
Animal testing went well, at both the non-primate and primate stages. That was not the case for all candidate vaccines. A matter of public record.
-
Patients in the human trials could, and in some cases, did withdraw. Several subsequent vaccine trials have been disrupted by subjects who withdrew in order to take one of the approved vaccines.
-
What is in the vaccine is not particularly hard to obtain. Active ingredient in Pfizer is mRNA, which is pretty well known. Non-medicinal is:
- ALC-0315 = ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate)
- ALC-0159 = 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
- 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
- cholesterol
- dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
- monobasic potassium phosphate
- potassium chloride
- sodium chloride
- sucrose
- water for injection
subject to some variations depending on version. The exact ratios are what is proprietary.
- I haven’t heard 70, but I have heard 55 years for US Freedom of Information. That is not for the results, though, nor even the data. That number governed the request for all documents pertaining to the entire process, including notes from everyone involved, estimated at 329,000 pages. The 55 years is a function of the FDA’s normal processing speed per page, which is why the court will almost inevitably side with the FDA. Note that the 55 year is to fully comply…the FDA has already said they will begin delivering the material as soon as the request reaches the top of the queue, which is 400 requests long.
The results and statistical data were released to the public as part of the FDA hearing to approve.
- Liability is indeed a tricky issue, because pharmaceutical companies always cover themselves with disclaimers and cautions across any imaginable condition or drug interaction, until proven otherwise.
8 Likes
Yeah I saw a video really sorry I work and don’t have time to procrastinate all the time on the web and have dark thoughts about how the unvaccinated should die…but you are so far into the political bullshit that you cannot see the wood for the trees, the fact that you cannot answer the questions as to what is in the vaccine ? Or why the pharmaceutical companies are immune from prosecution is astounding that you blindly no longer question the narrative
Can you tell me what’s in milk? Or, what’s in Oban/Talisker/any whiskey?
2 Likes
Not that this info will make any difference to him. It will just be onto the next ‘but what is xyz going to achieve with ABC because of the square root of 652’
The waivers from civil liability in the US (and Canada) cover civil liability only, nothing to do with any possible criminal prosecution.
1 Like