Tuchel is like a rather figure, if your perspective of what a dad is is based on watching your dad walk out on your mum when you were 6 and then being only intermittently involved in your life thereafter, as likely to no show or show up drunk when you had plans as to actually be there.
His reputation is based on a career across 4 high profile jobs, in all of which he has publicly, many would say petulantly, fallen our with his bosses in ways that are just not tenable for those relationships to continue. Bayern is probably his most drama free run.
He will get other jobs because he is a decent coach, but he has nothing on his resume to justify putting up with the shit that he will inevitably raise. What notable about his falls outs is that 1) they are of the sort every manager has with his bosses, but only those with a reputation for being trouble go public with. 2) he isnt even consistent. At Dortmund he fell out with Watzke saying it was impossible to coach when you dont get a say over the players you have, and did the same at PSG. Yet at Chelsea he took on Bohely saying he was a coach not a manager. He more or less forced him to fire him over a perspective 180 degrees removed from what he’d previously held about the manager’s roll in picking the players available to him. Maybe his perspective on the role of manager changed after his experience at Dortmund and PSG…or maybe he just picks his position based on whatever is necessary to get into a fight with his boss that he then go public with because he’s a walking argument?