Bruno is a limited lower qualitt version of Phil. But United need all the players they can get right now if they have to qualify either for the europa or for the conference
1 Like
Yea I know, that’s why it’s odd. It’s like advertising that the man-united-that’s-ripped-off-by-whiny-faux-stars is still open for business.
1 Like
Deluded cunts over on’t Caf reckon Bruno is “world class” and one of the best in his position. I absolutely fucking love it, because the salt mines over there when he continues to be shit next season are going to be glorious.
I’m sure that the portly but reliable @SBYM will have plenty of choice snippets to post here as the months fall off the calendar.
5 Likes
He was reasonably good at winning and scoring penalties. The Caf want to build the squad round him.
1 Like
A part of me thinks that the class of 92 would want ETH to fail as well… The same way they are disparaging Ralf. This way , they come back and say … Hey we told you… Ole was the best choice.
The amount of influence they have over the discourse at man utd is staggering and that includes later additions like rio as well.
This is good. This is the way
3 Likes
He’s not portly. He’s festively plump.
5 Likes
Here’s a gloriously insightful gem from the Caf:
In the past 10 years, how many PL clubs did better than us? It is only three: City, Liverpool and Chelsea.
From the rest, Spurs had a few good years but won absolutely nothing, Arsenal has been doing worse than us, Leicester won a championship but on the average they are doing worse. Everyone else is further below.
So, the question is: why did those three clubs do better than us? Well, Liverpool has a better manager. City has a better manager and more money. Chelsea has (had) more money. It’s either a manager or a lot of money.
This simplified analysis shows that our main problem is to find a manager who is better than those three. It is easy to say that, but it is really hard to find someone better than both Pep and Klopp.
5 Likes
I mean he’s overweight, regardless. We’re splitting hairs here, ffs…
3 Likes
So, the question is: why did those three clubs do better than us? Well, Liverpool has a better manager. City has a better manager and more money. Chelsea has (had) more money. It’s either a manager or a lot of money.
Doesn’t it register with these that they have literally spent more money than anyone?
5 Likes
The one thing you need is a shiny new manager, never a complete overhaul of the top level of the club.
1 Like
Not sure why
“Red Army”.
1 Like
Man United are living that Metallica song wherein James Hetfield croons that “it comes to be, when you’re seeing a light at the end of your tunnel, it’s just a freight train coming your way.”
Every time they think the club has done something good (bring in LVG, sign Di Maria, bring in Mourinho, sign Pogba, sign Sanchez, give Ole the job, sign Maguire, sign Ronaldo, extend Toothy Joe, etc), it turns out to just be another reason for their steady decline.
Ten Hag will be no different.
5 Likes
Like the FIFA football manager generation.
Get it in all supporters, at the moment it’s lists for the summer, effectively about 7 players and the end they go, “I’ll be happy with that”.
When realistically two of them would do and that should be enough.
Then again Ronaldo and this is a “game changer” rubbish fuelled by pundits who haven’t a clue and who hadn’t watched him for about 3 years.
1 Like
Give et ta giggsae
3 Likes
As a Welshman, I second this motion. His attitude towards women certainly gels well with the current United squad.
If anything , this guarantees that he will be abused even more.
Ralf just cant communicate with the press. Ive heard his sessions that he gave for the coaches voice and hes extremely likable and has solid understanding of the game. Hes almost too nice to be in management.
Ten Haag will need atleast 3 seasons to mould the team to his liking. Man Utd managers generally have only 2 seasons.
1 Like
I feel like they’re being trolled now. Van Gaal’s comments about them being a commercial company were funny and correct, and their push back was silly “well why did he sign a contract with them?” Uh, maybe he is expressing a conclusion informed by inside knowledge that he didnt have at the time?
The yesterday Pep lauded Ten Haag as his replacement at City…which I interpreted as him telling him not to both with Utd’s overtures.
5 Likes