Yes, it is. There is perhaps a certain silliness to it all, ‘people of color’ is fine, ‘colored people’ is retrograde, but people are sensitive about stuff like that. Funny how having laws written to restrict ‘colored people’ leaves a lasting and harmful resentment on the people subject to those laws.
US usage, so in referring to their usage I use their spelling. So ‘people of color’ doesn’t phase me, ‘people of colour’ seems odd. However, at least here, American usage has become more and more common. Definitely something we want to import, American race relations and discourse…
It really is, especially as we become increasingly non-binary, it can be really difficult to keep track of what terms are currently preferred and which are antiquated. Most of us are going to make mistakes when dealing with someone from a group you’re not exposed to enough to know the terminology. But the issue here is he is the chairman of the FA in a time with unprecedented focus on the role of BAME in football and society. He shouldnt be unaware and the fact he is speaks to him being the wrong man for the job at this time. Maybe.
Different places have different societal norms I guess. Here in South Africa we have Black, White, Indian and… Coloured as our four main race groups and all are proud to be called as such. Our history is of course very much different and Coloured history and the origin of the ethnic group is a topic all on its own but the term carries no derogatory meaning here whatsoever.