the rumours about his lower wage seem to pop up frequently…IF true…maybe thats harbouring some resentment and an unwillingness to sign an extention…
i understand from the players POV and if he was much more valued and larger sum would hve been offered earlier…
i get the ‘he signed the contract he should honour it blah blah blah’ angle…but if you are the 17th highest paid player at the club, and your contribution far outweighs that status…maybe he was hoping or asking for a bump before now…
would put into perspective constant rumours about Barca wanting him as maybe not barca driven?
The rumours come from an American sports website that has no sourcing for their stated salary, not just on him either but on any player.
They’re primarily baseball/american football and basketball sites who extended their coverage to football but have to guess at salaries as they are not publically reported, unlike in American sports.
i can 100% buy into a large multi national corporation (even if i love them) lowballing a 20 something kid on his value and running that contract as long as they can…
we can dismiss some gossip straight out of hand, i just thought the Luis Diaz situation had enough beleivability around it to at least discuss it in an hopefully mature manner
again…IF true…plays a major role in the conversation
I think the clickbait is increasingly AI driven. Someone puts a humorous Tweet about us getting Ian Rush out of retirement and “Liverpool linked to Welsh wonder striker” ends up on the 1500 different REACH titles.
It’s depressing. I can remember when the Echo and MEN were serious regional newspapers.
Before I share James Pearce’s latest transfer piece from the athletic, are there any rules on this forum against sharing content from paywalled websites?