FFS!!!
3 Likes
Whipping boys is a worthy discussion, Iāll start it and avoid derailing here
70 million isnāt a lot
Not sure why Jones would be only valued at 35 million?
The value for Jones seems way too low to me. I really hope he signs an extension.
And I completely agree, 70M is not what it used to be, so if we end up selling Cody for that sort of sum, itās just what 40M was a season or two ago!
Never rated him anyway.
3 Likes
He is only 16 anyway
Wouldnt be much use to us for maybe 4 years.
2 Likes
Understandable really. Heās just a young kid.
3 Likes
Wirtzās rough first year canāt have painted the potential move in a positive light either.
4 Likes
Honestly I think itās a good decision by him. From what I saw the plan was to sign him then loan him out again immediately probably to Leverkusen. Iād be wary about that kind of pathway if I was him. Lots of very talented kids have gone straight into the elite team loan army and faded away.
Iād prefer to stay at a club where I was a permanent player, develop there and then try and move up a level.
As for us it makes sense that we are trying to grab players earlier since if someone like Eichhorn is the real deal then one good season and heāll be getting quoted at 100m in todayās marketā¦ but I donāt begrudge the kid from rejecting the huge move at this point in his career.
6 Likes
Probably end up at Bayern in the future.
2 Likes
Isnāt ITKSpace = @Walshy07 
https://x.com/ITKSpace/status/2064370298107900192?s=20
Space |
@ITKSpace
11m
There is absolutely no truth to reports suggesting that Kennet Eichhorn has rejected Liverpool. The reality is that discussions remain ongoing, with the main complexities relating to legal and regulatory structures surrounding signing-on payments and compensation mechanisms sought by the playerās camp, while Liverpoolās interest remains as strong as ever and the playerās long-term desire to join the club has never changed, with all parties continuing to explore solutions that could ultimately pave the way for his dream move to Anfield.The original plan always envisaged Kennet Eichhorn spending time elsewhere before eventually arriving at Anfield due to the well-known legal complications surrounding underage transfers following Brexit, with Liverpool initially intending to sign the player before immediately loaning him out, while current discussions, involving Liverpool, the playerās camp and several potential destination clubs in Germany, are focused on an alternative route towards the same long-term objective, one that could see him permanently join a German side, with Bayer Leverkusen among the possibilities, before a release clause becomes active within a defined timeframe, potentially allowing Liverpool to complete the move at a later date once the relevant legal, regulatory and contractual considerations have been resolved.
For Liverpool, such a structure would provide a clear and legally secure route to secure a player they continue to value highly, while for Eichhorn it would preserve the prospect of one day realising what those close to the situation describe as his dream move to Liverpool Football Club, a club he has admired since childhood. The story is not about rejection, despite what certain mouthpiece reporters have attempted to portray, but about finding the appropriate legal and financial framework to facilitate an outcome that all parties have broadly been working towards from the very beginning.
4 Likes
Perfect reason for us giving him a wide berth.
2 Likes
I donāt really believe what looks like itās been AI generated but Florian isnāt that reliable eithier.
So I guess we will see.
Those articles donāt take context into it at all and so wouldnāt survive any sort of scrutiny.
As I said, if you want to compare Salahās performance to the period when we did not have a natural attacker (after Isakās injury and further after Ekitikeās) thatās fine. Yes, we could barely score without Salah when the others were out and our goals dropped without them. For those few months, we were dependent on Salah.
All I can say is, itās not convincing. Otherwise we would not be so open to letting him go.
I agree with what @Sweeting said in his video. That it probably worked out best for us. We needed some headroom in the salary space to revamp the squad and itās the end of the great Klopp cycle so it was good that we parted ways as amicably as possible with our legend Mo.
1 Like
Iām making up a rumour myself here. Apparently, Mourinho wants bring Calafiori to RM as he played under JM at Roma. If that were to happen, then that might put Huijsenās place in the team at risk. RM might even try to get rid. In that event, I wonder if heād fancy being reunited with his former coach?
Well, there arenāt any other rumours rolling around at the moment.
6 Likes
I could see Mourinho not being that interested in having a young central defender as one of his trusted guys. Liverpool already have two of those, so Iām not sure theyād go for Huijsen as well. But you never know.
Itās a solid rumour this, I like it. Just keep them coming, get yourself a blue tick account, and youāre in business.
5 Likes
Well personally I like the rumour. Itās high in the unreliable percentage. High in its unlikely to ever occur and very high in media savvy 1+1 =3 when it comes to LFC. I think you cracked it.
2 Likes