Wasn’t commenting on the validity of that statement, just that it is irrelevant to the current bunch of charlatans who were corrupt long before they came to power. In fact, corruption is how most of them achieved the power
They are banging the drum on corruption, on the rule breaking. Boris Johnson makes an absolute shitshow of himself every wednesday morning.
There is a second pillar of Government accountability, and that’s the media. I don’t buy newspapers, but I will regularly look at the front pages. There is a marked difference between the Guardian, the Mirror and the Independent and the rest. The Daily Mail have been hammering Boris personally of late, but remain pro-government. The rest forget about. Boris could piss on the cenotaph and The Telegraph would turn a blind eye.
It’s unfortunate that a large section of our media is controlled by people who have a vested interest in keeping the conservatives in power, regardless of how bad it gets.
When people say they should be doing more to hold the Government to account, it would be interesting to know what they would like them to do.
I would like Labour to do more to present a vision of what the country looks like under Labour. But again, that isn’t going to transmit to the public if the media won’t cover it.
I thought it was very interesting how BBC reported Djokovic.
The emphasis was all upon Australia, how unjust it was. It was an after thought the players irresponsible behaviour. The website at least was very slanted towards personal liberties.
For me they need to stamp on his BS. Tough to do but if that meant having an earpiece during PMQ’s to a fact checker so be it.
I agree some clarification on their stance on things would also be beneficial. For example when Boris shouts that Labour would rejoin the EU (as he did last week), correct him and say that they would work to correct the utter mess that the government has created.
Basically just don’t let him say what he wants without any reposte.
You know I’m referring to Boris and his cabinet and are just being captious in your defence of them. I do find it strange that someone would spend so much time on a LFC forum defending the Tories/indefensible
Part of the problem is the initial fund that they set up only covered buildings over 18 meters, so any building under that height has been ignored and left to the leaseholders up untill the recent ruling which forced the change