There is/was never any proof to the allegations thrown out there by the tory journalists…
As any good judge would never pass judgment without asking for evidence… There will be a lot more bull-shit heading the way of any rising star in the Labour Party…
For me, the FT is the pinnacle of objective reporting in the UK. It has excellent contributors and is pretty good at providing information clearly and without an obvious agenda.
After that you’re probably looking towards Channel 4 news, the Independent and the two you’ve already mentioned.
FT is behind paywall
Independent??? Do you think they are objective??? Maybe it was an isolated incident, but I found some of their articles pretty biased. Still, will try again.
Yes, I would recommend following on twitter as many of the contributors to the Financial Times as possible. Most of the coronavirus reporting on the FT is not paywalled (as far as I’m aware) and it’s very, very good. The other news items generally are paywalled but their contributors often tweet about the current affairs upon which they write articles anyway so there’s lots of really good information you can get from them directly through twitter.
I think it is exactly the opposite. Starmer would have had no interest in picking this fight, particularly not at this time. But the Labour anti-semitism problem is an open wound that he absolutely must be able to put behind the party for them to have any hope for the next electoral cycle, and Momentum/Corbyn have refused to let that just happen.