Haha its been going on for the past 25 years
Brilliant, I was reading about the Irish equivalent a few months ago (canāt remember why probably just museing about the continental shelf, corals, sea weed and the such like). iāll give that a bouchers later (thereās a match tonight.
They know where the undersea UFO bases are mateā¦ner-nee-ner-ner
Iāll get my tin foil hat out
Cleverly doing the rounds (saying same thing on multiple interviews) gas-lighting.
He must be completely ignorant and dishonest over the shenanigans over the Irish border stuff then. Just business as usual!
If a deal is substantially done, then it would be insanity to walk away from negotiations over the (few?) remaining sticking points.
Consequently, an extension of time (of the transition period), to enable negotiations to continue whilst ensuring the least disruption to trade, would therefore, in my opinion, be the logical way to go.
However, would this be seen as an āUā turn / loss of face, by Bojo; and would his party support it?
āIf you sign a deal with us we might not override our previous deal.ā
Turns out chatting with Ursula didnāt achieve anything, who could have possibly predicted that?
Sounds reasonable
The awkward point there is that extension of the transition period will require agreement from the member states. I have no idea what the disposition of each member would be.
Iām sure Bozo used his charm and made loads of crap Ursula Undress jokes.
My guess is France would be against I just get a feeling they have had enough, they drew their lines a long time ago and the UK hasnāt even gotten close.
Likewise parliamentary approval.
I would hope that both sides would accept an extension of time of the transition period, albeit with a faux show of reluctance, rather than being portrayed as being unreasonable and the party guilty of killing off any chance of a deal.
Some hope, I know.
Parliamentary approval would be a rubber stamp, I expect. The risk around member state approval is more complicated, because I believe that would require unanimity, which in turn would mean some members with other agendas on otherwise unconnected matters would have the opportunity to link their extension vote. The EU is facing a good many challenges right now.
Possible, but France also has an enormous stake in getting to some kind of deal - not just any deal though.
This all sounds very fishy to me.
Iām not so certain; there are a number of hard Brexit Tories who would prefer no deal and would be willing to rebel to achieve their ends. Would Bojo be prepared to risk his standing (accusations of backsliding / weakness etc), and being dependent on Labour / SNP votes against a large block of his own mps, to get it done?
That is a definite risk. It would come down to what pressure the other member states could (or would be willing) to apply.
Suddenly Iām a lot less certain that an extension of time might happen.
With every failed extension the prospect of another diminishes, but in this case, what is the alternative? I think it depends whether the interested parties consider the residual issues intractable.