UK Politics Thread (Part 1)

Haha its been going on for the past 25 years

2 Likes

Brilliant, I was reading about the Irish equivalent a few months ago (canā€™t remember why probably just museing about the continental shelf, corals, sea weed and the such like). iā€™ll give that a bouchers later (thereā€™s a match tonight. :smiley:

2 Likes

They know where the undersea UFO bases are mateā€¦ner-nee-ner-ner

2 Likes

Iā€™ll get my tin foil hat out :wink:

1 Like

Cleverly doing the rounds (saying same thing on multiple interviews) gas-lighting.

2 Likes

He must be completely ignorant and dishonest over the shenanigans over the Irish border stuff then. Just business as usual! :cry:

3 Likes
1 Like

If a deal is substantially done, then it would be insanity to walk away from negotiations over the (few?) remaining sticking points.

Consequently, an extension of time (of the transition period), to enable negotiations to continue whilst ensuring the least disruption to trade, would therefore, in my opinion, be the logical way to go.

However, would this be seen as an ā€œUā€ turn / loss of face, by Bojo; and would his party support it?

1 Like

ā€˜If you sign a deal with us we might not override our previous deal.ā€™

6 Likes

Turns out chatting with Ursula didnā€™t achieve anything, who could have possibly predicted that? :anguished:

4 Likes

Sounds reasonable :rofl:

2 Likes

The awkward point there is that extension of the transition period will require agreement from the member states. I have no idea what the disposition of each member would be.

2 Likes

Iā€™m sure Bozo used his charm and made loads of crap Ursula Undress jokes.

3 Likes

My guess is France would be against I just get a feeling they have had enough, they drew their lines a long time ago and the UK hasnā€™t even gotten close.

1 Like

Likewise parliamentary approval.

I would hope that both sides would accept an extension of time of the transition period, albeit with a faux show of reluctance, rather than being portrayed as being unreasonable and the party guilty of killing off any chance of a deal.

Some hope, I know. :thinking:

1 Like

Parliamentary approval would be a rubber stamp, I expect. The risk around member state approval is more complicated, because I believe that would require unanimity, which in turn would mean some members with other agendas on otherwise unconnected matters would have the opportunity to link their extension vote. The EU is facing a good many challenges right now.

2 Likes

Possible, but France also has an enormous stake in getting to some kind of deal - not just any deal though.

2 Likes

This all sounds very fishy to me.

2 Likes

Iā€™m not so certain; there are a number of hard Brexit Tories who would prefer no deal and would be willing to rebel to achieve their ends. Would Bojo be prepared to risk his standing (accusations of backsliding / weakness etc), and being dependent on Labour / SNP votes against a large block of his own mps, to get it done?

That is a definite risk. It would come down to what pressure the other member states could (or would be willing) to apply.

Suddenly Iā€™m a lot less certain that an extension of time might happen. :thinking:

2 Likes

With every failed extension the prospect of another diminishes, but in this case, what is the alternative? I think it depends whether the interested parties consider the residual issues intractable.

1 Like