Would be very interesting. I´d imagine it´s 60 million quid or more to put towards other positions we need.
Could also be a statement, assuming Barcola comes in, that we are happy with Barcola, Muñoz and Rio as our options, with Chiesa, Wirtz occasionally and Frimpong as backups.
Or we could want two wide players still. Basically opens a lot of possibilities.
Ok, I take it all back. You’re a baddie.
Perhaps overegged the pudding and should have qualified.. “when compared to other wide players”… Sorry, it was late.
Don’t worry, there are plenty of people on here who are capable of producing mind numbing amounts of balderdash, myself included.
By the way, the built-in translator on my new tablet always translates “Barcola” as “Rum Cola”—I find that really charming. 
It’s based on your typing habits. Just saying…
nice try @Livvy we know the truth now
I’d want more then 60m for him. 80m at least in the current market. Gakpo in the right set up could give someone 10 to 15 goals in a season. That shouldn’t be let go too cheap.
Having Frimpong and Cheisa as back ups for any position is suicide on the clubs part.
You mean like he did before the Slothball season where absolutely everyone was shite.
Really gotta stop snitching on myself.
Bimbo gigante makes me think of Infantino or is that supposed to be the joke?
Yes exactly and Iraola sounds flexible enough to tweek his system to try and get the best out of each forward when they are on the pitch and not expect them to all play the same.
Aye, he got 9 last year even in a system where everything was wrong.
Bimbo Gigante translates to “giant kid”, while Infantino means “little kid”. Thinking I should be on the ballot for the FIFA presidential elections on that basis alone. Not saying I’d do a better job, the opposite in fact, but I think we can all agree it’s time for change.
cough cough Dildo Waggins cough
80m and he can go
So why are they here?
I´d hope so but being conservative it should be at least 60