Yeah true.
Could be all bullsh*t, they did it when weâve signed Virgil as well. Letâs wait and see.
I am already turned off to be honestâŚLavia it is.
Almost like they shouldnât have been allowed to just write off over ÂŁ1b of debt overnight with no penalty.
https://twitter.com/Chris78Williams/status/1689952825080467456?s=20
Chelsea are cunts.
I really wish people could refrain from posting drivel from no-marks on Twitter all the fucking time.
By the way, @Walshy07 , thatâs aimed at everyone- not just you as the last poster.
Earliest we can register him? Is it possible for him to be dressed Sunday if registered today? Could be reason for chelsea trying to delay as well
Hmmm! If this is all true, Liverpool are just trying to get Lavia for a little bit cheaper and then the owners can be like âHey fans, look, we were willing to pay $110 million for a player but he didnât want to come here. Donât be mad at usâ
player power though. Player has already thrown toys out by clearing out locker and planting himself in London. Next would be a transfer requestâŚ
canât register player unless he has signed contract, he has not signed.
I wouldnât know tbh, he may be dress resistant
Obviously, Iâm saying if he signs today.
Why would anyone be mad at the owners over a player who decides he doesnât want to sign for us?
Yes, but as things stand we are bit far from that
Yep, sounds about right. Only Caicedo can reopen channels with brighton by refusing to go to LFC
As it stands Brighton have accepted our offer apparently.
My understanding is that is basically legally binding as a gentlemanâs agreement (whatever oral or written agreements have been agreed)
Only things that can now stop this is the player refuses to join or he fails a medical.
I always wanted him and am chuffed the deal is back on.
And? A transfer request can be refused. It would also be pointless anyway given Brighton are in the process of transferring him to us