Is that it?
Trent handles the ball vs Leeds and that evens everything up?
Seriously?
2 Likes
Iâm afraid it is you that doesnât understand the laws of the game. Iâve pasted the law and nothing youâve said is mentioned in it.
Youâre adding your own interpretation and, one might say bias, to that.
You really need to stop now.
The âendangermentâ aspect in the Jota incident is caused by the Spurs player. There is no excessive force or brutality.
Compare it with the Haaland one early season.
By your reckoning no player should raise a foot above knee height in case someone runs into it.
Putting it in the same bracket as Mings is as I said incompressible
2 Likes
1 Like
Weâll agree to disagree. You think itâs a level playing field, I donât. No probs 
2 Likes
Regarding the offside one, it was just before that someone was offside
1 Like
the TAA âhand ballâ vs City was before VAR wasnt it?
also, i think it was that incident that Raheem could have tried to finish the ball (advantage) but decided to appeal insteadâŠjustice really.
if it was to all be pulled back and Fabinhos goal disallowed, it would have been our free for the silva original handball anywaysâŠ
EDITED TO ADD CONTENT BELOW
the FACT was it wasnt a foul anyway, especially if Silvas one wasnt a foul, its also very telling and only emphasises the point of a bias, that at the time Man City were apoplectic about the incident whilst ignoring the 2 seconds earlier, and the press were happy to run with the line, including the comentators at the time, who concentrated on the TAA incidentâŠthat all these years later its pointed out as a âfavourâ of some kind to Liverpool just feeds the narative.
No Foul, and if it was, it wasnt the first foul in that particular moment, ergo, no free kick, or free kick to LFC.
furthermore, that was IN our box, a place from which Fabinho definately did not score, the passage of play proceeded and everyone knew it was game on, we didnt score from the incident.
we also went on to win the game convincingly 3-1 IIRC
we also went on to monster the league IIRC
shades of Kompany on Salah it was not
6 Likes
âKnee heightâ 
Doesnât need excessive force or brutality, just that it endangours an opponent.
Feel free to shout into thin air, Iâm done with this stupidity.
1 Like
You really love to change the spirit of what people say to suit your narrative.
You have this rigid mentality surrounding laws of the game, and fail to understand nuances or application.
Then you take this higher ground to make yourself sound knowledgeable.
Whether you agree with me or not is immaterial.
But your method of discussion?
FFS
2 Likes
The ref allegedly told a Fulham player at half time that he made the wrong callâŠ
Just from this season that I could remember. I think most of them are probably the correct call but quite line ball, which is the point I want to make.
To provide a bit of balance, if we are going to include all tight calls to the Liverpool conspiracy bank like what is being done here, all these ones would have been added to that bank by Liverpool fans if we were instead on the receiving end.
You canât have it both ways.
2 Likes
Conspiracy bank?
You are funny.
1 Like
Just to put in a bit of context.
We are having our worst season in a few years.
And we get a couple of marginal calls.
Does this really offer evidence that we havenât been shafted in previous seasons?
As @jaffod showed yesterday, season defining decisions.
I understand that there are people seeking balance, and believe that a form of equity existsâŠ
But I am unsure if the equation is correct.
My view is that it is loaded against Liverpool.
Edit: Fabinho should have got a red card. Totally agree on that much
1 Like
This âclassicâ? Ha ha ha, great choice of words. Is that the one where Silva deflected the ball on to Trentâs arm with his own arm and we scored about 20 seconds later in a different phase of play?
4 Likes
At the end of the day we have been robbed of two PL titles by the bent officials.
At least a team got a apology for one of them.
6 Likes
Iâm looking forward to City being found guilty of 114 charges relating to financial doping, and youâll have people on here going
âyeah, but what about that time our scouts left for City and didnât remove their passwords from the system. We are not sqeaky clean eitherâ
2 Likes
Three.
2 Likes
Only when we were no danger to the PL darlings.
When we started to win again the usual BS apeart out of nowhereâŠ
6 Likes
So true. No real problems until we put a winning run together that threatened to get us a top 4 place, then Tierney, Taylor and this Brooks clown turn up and the same old bs is evident.
8 Likes
I think if we did a review of last seasonâs decisions youâd probably find that City and us probably got some lucky calls - a bit of luck with the refs is almost a requirement to be in a title run - but City almost certainly got more lucky than us.
I doubt there is anyone on this forum that has a problem with suggesting we get less calls than, say, City or United in general. Itâs when the suggestion is that these ref calls are deliberate and premeditated. Bad ref calls donât necessarily stem from corruption. I think there is much stronger evidence that it is caused by public pressure. Public: âThe refs give too many penalties at Anfieldâ. Result: no penalties at Anfield. Public: âLiVARpoolâ. Result: less calls in our favour. Public: âManĂ© is a diverâ. Result: no calls for ManĂ©. Public: " Salah is a diver". Result: no calls for Salah.
None of this makes it any better. Refs shouldnât be this influenced. But I think this is more the case than corruption.
1 Like
Lots of the referees I can believe are just a bit biased, or a bit Billy big bollocks when it comes to Anfield. Not intentionally
But Greater Manchesterâs Paul Tierney and Anthony Taylor have a nasty whiff about them. Theyâve been at the centre of too many massive decisions that have directly shafted Liverpool and benefitted City.
7 Likes