It confirms everything I think about Refs. I don’t believe in grand conspiracies, although there are obviously a fair few that hate us.
But I think consistently you have referees who approach decisions not really in the mindset of trying to get that decision objectively right, but how does the decision fit in with the narrative of the game of the circumstances surrounding it.
I’ll take a bad decision any day, but what boils my piss more than anything is when it’s obvious that a referee is doing their best to manage the story of a game rather than be a neutral arbiter of the rules.
I read this comment on quite a few fan websites (other teams) and it is always the same names that crop up. For instance both sets of Manchester fans seem to hate Anthony Taylor and so do Evertonians. Everyone seems to hate Jon Moss too.
Now that means that they are either biased against all teams or just not very good or even handed. Which is it?
Perhaps they just hate their job and hate football and hate footballers in general.
Come across these statements so often. Just because everyone believes the same thing doesn’t mean they all have to be right or all wrong. United fans (after years of unnaturally favourable calls) may believe they are hard done by when correct but contentious calls don’t go their way or 70/30s against them aren’t suspiciously called in their favour like they are used to. That doesn’t mean the calls are bad or they are justified for feeling this way. It also doesn’t mean Liverpool fans are wrong for questioning decision after decision that is categorically wrong and called against them. Whether consciously (corruption/general dislike purposely influencing them) or unconsciously (bias and “officiating to the narrative”) Liverpool have time and time again been shown to get more incorrect calls against them than other teams. United more in favour. Some of this comes from the culture installed by fear of Ferguson that past now retired officials have confirmed used to influence them.
There was a study from some Welsh University Sports Science Department that I saw at the end of the season we finished top saying we got I think the most marginal VAR decisions in our favour but they weren’t saying they were right or wrong decisions.
But that’s the point. The first season VAR came in, when it was brand new and more categorically correct or incorrect decisions (as opposed to contentious subjective decisions it was never meant for) we finally got a fair shake and won the bloody league (so good that season we probably would have won anyway but few extra undeserved points for City in the early stages, few points less than we deserved, keeping the race a lot tighter throughout, can’t make assumptions).
And by independent/neutral accounts of how many decisions have then appeared incorrect. Some shared in this thread from this season.
There are no grand conspiracies, I 100% agree on that.
There is bias evident though, as shown time and time again, again I believe we are in agreement.
The Oliver admission following the assault by Pickford supports your final point.
Listen to Clattenburg’s comments about the Sterling penalty. In his evaluation, at no point does he discuss the rule or his interpretation of what happened. Instead his primary focus is on whether the ref will want to determine a game of this magnitude on such a trivial contact.
And this is where unconscious bias can have an absolutely massive impact. If the culture within the FA is that say United are the saviours of English football, the team that should be winning according to the narrative and your life isn’t going to be worth living if you make a mistake that has a negative effect on their game how much is going to go in their favour? How long is it going to take to stop? Likewise if Liverpool are jumped up lil gobshites always causing trouble and full of players like Suarez and Salah diving all over the place to get them more than they deserve how much are you going to be careful not to award to them? The way English officials work is awful and so wide open to accidental corruption and manipulation by media/powerful figures in the sport.
Putting this here until @Quicksand has a pre-match thread in place…
Mike ‘Centre Stage’ Dean is the referee against Burnley…!
Those that remember… he was also the Showboat in the middle at same game last season, when he awarded that nonsensical penalty against us…
Just wondering on this, players go down to get decisions for the reason above then? Refs do not blow in your favor unless you go down. And if you do it, you’re labeled a diver. It’s a no win situation for the players, the honest ones at least.