The Unreliable Rumours Discussion Thread (Part 2)

Only by idiots. Sensible fans can see he is showing outstanding potential and developing just fine

9 Likes

Yeah, I didn’t mean it was my priority based on my wishes, but what I thought/think the club would do. Sell one of Matip/Gomez and get a good, fit player who can battle with Konate at RCB to be Virgil’s partner.

This player will cost only 20 million and so at that price there is no risk

Elliott cost less than 4 million but isnt good enough and that is a problem that requires to go and sign additional players.

I am not capable of connecting these dots

1 Like

I find the R vs L CB thing possibly one of the most overblown issues in modern fandom.

It is true that left footers being less common most teams will need to find a right footed one who is comfortable playing on that side and that is an added challenge. But you take someone like Virgil who plays on that side because he can, not because he has to. You pair him in a back 4 with a naturally left footed player like Ake and he switches over to his natural side with no issue just as he would if we brought in someone like N’Dikia or Gvardiol.

6 Likes

He’s shit for the Netherlands though :grinning:

Virgil could do it in theory, even if I don’t know if I saw him much playing there. I said a few posts above that there’s a possibility Virgil could shift from LCB ro RCB whether he’s partnered with N’Dicka or Konate. Maybe we want new protection around Trent (new RCB whether it’s Virgil or a new guy, someone who would compete/operate at RCM), who knows. But what I’m also pretty sure is that the coaching staff doesn’t want that to flip CB’s positions from right to left too much.

I don’t think it’s overblown, I see that a lot of the fans/media don’t even pay enough attention to it. Sometimes it smells like trouble, but it turns out to be fine (like Morocco going far at the WC with two lefties at CB, from practically game one right until the end). But that’s rare to see in football. Nobody is saying Virgil cannot play at RCB, but that if we really want N’Dicka, that is interesting. Either Virgil is going to swap sides at CB more or N’Dicka won’t even play much initially but act as backup and wait for his chance.

1 Like

Nope but I don’t think either of us want to be here all day discussing that.

Elliott wasn’t a risk either if that helps…and no him not being good enough doesn’t mean we go and sign additional players…an underperforming team requires us to go and sign additional players.

Forget it, Jake. This is Chinatown (where we dont connect dots)

3 Likes

Mainly by you , it has to be said.

2 Likes

Le Fee is very strong defensively for a midfielder, I think he could be a really useful player for us.

However, we need more size and strength in there also. Le Fee can work but not if he’s playing next to Elliott and Fabinho.

1 Like

What’s the fee?

Whoever gets him, there’s a good song for him!

2 Likes

Because as most footballers are right footed he almost always plays with a partner who is also right footed, and so his comfort in making that switch means that is invariably the best choice for the team he plays on the left.

So, if we buy a CB who is left footed we’re faced with the prospect of switching Van Dijk to the right side when partnering the new guy and switching him back if we partner him with one of the other two guys. Yes that means switching Van Dijk around, but it also means switching your partnership which is something you want to limit anyway. So there issue there is the lack of consistency more than the lack of positional consistency for one player.

But what happens if we dont and we go for someone who isnt comfortable playing on the left side? What happens if we want to or need to play without Virgil? What happens in a year or two’s time when we want to evolve to the next generation? We’ll then have an entire corp only comfortable playing on the right?

Virgil being comfortable on the his less natural side is a bonus that allows us to go and find the best CB we can find without concern for which side he’s most comfortable on, with lots of reasons to prefer a left footed player. It certainly doesnt pigeon hole us into avoiding a left sided player.

1 Like

Gomez (if he stays out of him and Matip) and Konate have both played LCB when Virgil wasn’t available, out of the (main) CB’s we have left. Only Matip has only played RCB for us.

If we sign a RCB, he could also have the ability to play LCB. Then it would be up to us to judge who is Virgil’s replacement on the day out of the 2-3 options we have who can do a job there. Our last left footed CB was Klavan, so it’s a situation that is not unknown to us.

How tall are Caicedo, Enzo Fernandez?

Maybe not as harshly as me no but a lot have expressed their concerns on his position and where he fits…for me if you’re a good enough footballer you should be able to fit somewhere in any system.

I have the same take on him now as I did Jones a few years ago, I questioned the hype to all those who hyped him up to be something he’s not…take away the fancy shit that gets produced once a month and what is there?

Makes sense, but also that leaves Virgil playing most games, which is my worry.

A young guy playing in a struggling team and not in his favoured position isn’t going to shine too brightly.

Put Kelleher in midfield…problem solved